Амбівалентність російської ментальності
Loading...
Files
Date
2018
Authors
Лисенко, Олександр Віталійович
Lysenko, Oleksandr
Лысенко, Александр Витальевич
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
ДВНЗ «Київський національний економічний університет імені Вадима Гетьмана»
Abstract
Ретроспектива формування імперських амбіцій та ксенофобських світоглядних переконань росіян (від ідеї Святої Русі, через ідею Великої Русі до ідеї «Руського світу»)є вкрай актуальною в контексті усвідомлення ризиків та небезпек політичних, соціальних, культурних, релігійних відносин зі структурами влади та громадянського суспільства Російської Федерації в умовах гібридної війни. Виокремлення типових, константних та набутих в умовах сьогодення етно-психологічних ознак дозволить усвідомити динаміку розвитку російської ментальності; «розвінчати» глибоко укорінену ідеологему щодо «росіян як старших братів», а також вибудувати адекватну тактику та стратегію захисту національних інтересів.
The retrospective of the formation of imperial ambitions and xenophobic ideological beliefs of Russians (from the idea of the Holy Rus through the idea of the Great Russia and to the idea of the Russian world) is extremely relevant in the context of understanding the risks and dangers of political, social, cultural and religious relations with the structures of power and civil society of the Russian Federation in times of a hybrid war. The isolation of typical, constant ethno-psychological signs acquired in the contemporary conditions allows realizing the Russian mentality development dynamics; «undermining» a deeply rooted ideology of «Russians as elder brothers», as well as developing an adequate tactics and strategies to protect national interests. In conditions of war imposed to Ukraine by the Russian Federation, philosophers, political scientists, ethnographers, psychologists focus in their research on the peculiarities of Russian mentality, psycho-emotional type and ideological potential of the invaders; on the debacle of an illusion of fraternal blood-related links between Ukrainians and Russians; on identification of the real determinants of the Kremlin’s aggressive behavior in order to more effectively counteract the armed and ideological aggression. However, much has changed in Russian history since Nikolai Alexandrovich: the five periods distinguished by philosophers of freedom: Kyivan Rus’, Russia during the Tartar yoke, Grand Duchy of Moscow, the Russian Empire (Peter the Great), Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic, were complemented by the sixth, as now a new page is written – Putin’s Russia, which has its own specific image. The author highlights that this intelligence is acquired due to the fact that the fault of the greatly ambitious Russian ‘brother’ began the most intense fratricidal war in which the idea of Slavic identity became a mask-cover for imposing the insistent idea of ‘Russian peace’ from the side of military aggressor country Russia, which reveals the most complete and manifested image of Putin’s Russia.
The retrospective of the formation of imperial ambitions and xenophobic ideological beliefs of Russians (from the idea of the Holy Rus through the idea of the Great Russia and to the idea of the Russian world) is extremely relevant in the context of understanding the risks and dangers of political, social, cultural and religious relations with the structures of power and civil society of the Russian Federation in times of a hybrid war. The isolation of typical, constant ethno-psychological signs acquired in the contemporary conditions allows realizing the Russian mentality development dynamics; «undermining» a deeply rooted ideology of «Russians as elder brothers», as well as developing an adequate tactics and strategies to protect national interests. In conditions of war imposed to Ukraine by the Russian Federation, philosophers, political scientists, ethnographers, psychologists focus in their research on the peculiarities of Russian mentality, psycho-emotional type and ideological potential of the invaders; on the debacle of an illusion of fraternal blood-related links between Ukrainians and Russians; on identification of the real determinants of the Kremlin’s aggressive behavior in order to more effectively counteract the armed and ideological aggression. However, much has changed in Russian history since Nikolai Alexandrovich: the five periods distinguished by philosophers of freedom: Kyivan Rus’, Russia during the Tartar yoke, Grand Duchy of Moscow, the Russian Empire (Peter the Great), Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic, were complemented by the sixth, as now a new page is written – Putin’s Russia, which has its own specific image. The author highlights that this intelligence is acquired due to the fact that the fault of the greatly ambitious Russian ‘brother’ began the most intense fratricidal war in which the idea of Slavic identity became a mask-cover for imposing the insistent idea of ‘Russian peace’ from the side of military aggressor country Russia, which reveals the most complete and manifested image of Putin’s Russia.
Description
Keywords
душа, російська ідея, Київська Русь, Велике князівство Московське, Свята Росія, Православне царство, Третій Рим, імперіалізм, soul, Russian idea, Kyivan Rus’, Grand Duchy of Moscow, Holy Russia, Orthodox Tsardom, Third Rome, imperialism
Citation
Лисенко О. Амбівалентність російської ментальності / Олександр Лисенко // Університетська кафедра. Культурологія. Аксіологія. Філософія. Етнологія. Дискусії. Рецензії. Анотації : альм. / М-во освіти і науки України, ДВНЗ «Київ. нац. екон. ун-т ім. В. Гетьмана», Ін-т приклад. та проф. етики ; [редкол.: Ю. Вільчинський (голов. ред.) та ін.]. – Київ : КНЕУ, 2018. – № 7. – С. 157–164.