Personal income tax management in Ukraine on the game theory basis

dc.contributor.authorTymchenko, Olenauk
dc.contributor.authorТимченко, Олена Миколаївнаuk
dc.contributor.authorТимченко, Елена Николаевнаuk
dc.contributor.authorSybirianska, Yuliiauk
dc.contributor.authorСибірянська, Юлія Володимирівнаuk
dc.contributor.authorСибирянская, Юлия Владимировнаuk
dc.contributor.authorPolishchuk, Yevheniiauk
dc.contributor.authorПоліщук, Євгенія Анатоліївнаuk
dc.contributor.authorПолищук, Евгения Анатольевнаuk
dc.contributor.authorRudyk, Nataliiauk
dc.contributor.authorРудик, Наталія Василівнаuk
dc.contributor.authorРудик, Наталия Васильевнаuk
dc.contributor.authorKorotun, Volodymyruk
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-18T13:15:08Z
dc.date.available2019-04-18T13:15:08Z
dc.date.issued2018uk
dc.description.abstractOne of the main problems of the fiscal decentralization in Ukraine is the substantiation of the optimal proportion of the personal income tax distribution among the state and different types of local budgets in order to insure the sufficient financial resources for the territorial communities. Since period of the Budget Code adoption, the percentage of the personal income tax paid from salaries to the different levels of budgets has changed three times. However, the methodic of such distribution is not clear. The authors suggest approach of analyzing the logic of the personal income tax distribution on the game theory basis. They consider different ways of making decisions and prove that in all of the analyzed cases the winner was the central government of Ukraine. Such behavior of the central government in making decisions does not meet the goals of the fiscal decentralization reform. The main reason of such situation is that the decisions are made by the state government, but not by the local communities or their representatives. Besides, it is difficult to distribute the expenditures among different types of budgets according to the Governments’ competences. The authors suggest some recommendation of the personal income tax distribution in order to ensure benefits for all participants of the game: communities, local governments and central government. But they conclude that the active influence of people on the behavior of the local governments is the basic premise for the scientific research of the PIT optimal distribution.uk
dc.identifier.citationPersonal income tax management in Ukraine on the game theory basis / Olena Tymchenko, Yuliia Sybirianska, Yevheniia Polishchuk [and other] // Public and Municipal Finance. – 2018. – Vol. 7, Iss. 1. – P. 41–48.uk
dc.identifier.issn2222-1867uk
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.kneu.edu.ua:443/handle/2010/29502
dc.language.isoenuk
dc.publisherLLC “Consulting Publishing Company “Business Perspectives”uk
dc.subjectfiscal decentralizationuk
dc.subjectpersonal income taxuk
dc.subjectgame theoryuk
dc.subjectlocal budgets resourcesuk
dc.subjecttax managementuk
dc.titlePersonal income tax management in Ukraine on the game theory basisuk
dc.typeArticleuk
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
PMF_2018_01.pdf
Size:
197.22 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
3.97 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description: