Rankings in the higher education competitiveness management system

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorAntoniuk, Larysa
dc.contributor.authorАнтонюк, Лариса Леонтіївна
dc.contributor.authorАнтонюк, Лариса Леонтьевна
dc.contributor.authorKalenyuk, Iryna
dc.contributor.authorКаленюк, Ирина Сергеевна
dc.contributor.authorКаленюк, Ирина Сергеевна
dc.contributor.authorTsyrkun, Olena
dc.contributor.authorЦиркун, Олена Ігорівна
dc.contributor.authorЦиркун, Елена Игоревна
dc.contributor.authorSandul, Mariia
dc.contributor.authorСандул, Марія Станіславівна
dc.contributor.authorСандул, Мария Станиславовна
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-16T08:17:35Z
dc.date.available2020-01-16T08:17:35Z
dc.date.issued2019-12
dc.description.abstractThe modern approaches towards higher education systems management often tend to focus on separate universities’ performance, lacking the systemic view of the overall higher education systems’ competitiveness. Thus, the policymakers often fail in tailoring the higher education strategies to the mission of higher education in contemporary society. The article focuses on providing a systemic insight into the global competitive positioning of the national higher education systems. Based on the suggested ranking methodology, the authors perform the evaluation and ranking of 94 higher education systems, highlighting the limitations of this method, and the cluster analysis, identifying 3 types of their competitive positioning: leaders, followers, and underperformers. Based on Pearson coefficients of skewness and kurtosis calculation, the article shows that globally the inequalities in terms of higher education enrolment rate are decreasing, while those of R&D institutions quality and university-industry collaboration in research remain unchanged. Therefore, upgrading higher education quality assurance systems becomes the main strategic priority for the developing countries in terms of ensuring their higher education systems’ competitiveness. Given the levelling of higher education attainment and its quality worldwide, the authors anticipate further specialization of the universities and broadening of their role within the national innovation system. The article shows that the more comprehensive the approach for evaluating the higher education systems performance – the better the policymakers may benefit in terms of higher education strategic management.uk_UA
dc.identifier.citationRankings in the higher education competitiveness management system / Larysa Antoniuk, Iryna Kalenyuk, Olena Tsyrkun, Mariia Sandul // Problems and Perspectives in Management. – 2019. – Vol. 17, Iss. 4. – P. 325–339.uk_UA
dc.identifier.issn1727-7051
dc.identifier.urihttps://ir.kneu.edu.ua:443/handle/2010/31991
dc.language.isoenuk_UA
dc.publisherLLC “Consulting Publishing Company “Business Perspectives”uk_UA
dc.subjecthigher education systemuk_UA
dc.subjectcompetitionuk_UA
dc.subjectclusteringuk_UA
dc.subjectdevelopmentuk_UA
dc.subjectasymmetryuk_UA
dc.subjectcompetitive advantageuk_UA
dc.subjecthigher education strategyuk_UA
dc.titleRankings in the higher education competitiveness management systemuk_UA
dc.typeArticleuk_UA
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
PPM_19_4_A.pdf
Size:
510.47 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download
Collections
Кафедра міжнародної економіки